Bogley

Sombeech · Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 12128 Location: The Rubbish Bin

Iceaxe wrote:
That you are getting multiple complaints about a feature should be reason enough to review and improve it.

K, so is the ENTER button the main issue? That should be easy enough.

Iceaxe · Joined: 07 Mar 2005 Posts: 7759 Location: Local Bordello

Sombeech wrote: K, so is the ENTER button the main issue? That should be easy enough.

I would call "Navigation" the main issue. An easy to identify enter button above and below the slideshow should eliminate the problem.

:2thumbs:

hank moon · Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 941

Iceaxe wrote: I would call "Navigation" the main issue. An easy to identify enter button above and below the slideshow should eliminate the problem.

yes. see attached for screenshot w/o visibly obvious "enter" link.

Sombeech · Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 12128 Location: The Rubbish Bin

It seems there is a problem with more than just the ENTER link, but anyways.

When I was a newbie to the internet, I realized that when my "pointer thingy" went from arrow to finger, I could click there, and magical things awaited me.

This problem can be easily fixed. But let's be honest, would a top ENTER sign solve all of the negative feedback?

Plus, wouldn't another ENTER link be more flashy? :haha:

tanya · Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Posts: 5812 Location: St. George, Utah

kris247 wrote: tanya wrote: The group also has a ton of big photos, which might be the reason for all the log in errors we get. Perhaps deleting older photos is a good idea and not having them on the opening slide show.

Based on the error messages, the White Screen of Death errors we've been seeing lately ("Could not connect to the database") isn't caused by the large number of images on the site. It's caused by too many people connecting to the site at once, and maxing out the number of available database connections.

But there are only a few people that post or log in every day... it's not like there are hundreds... or even a hundred?

tanya · Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Posts: 5812 Location: St. George, Utah

Sombeech wrote: It seems there is a problem with more than just the ENTER link, but anyways.

When I was a newbie to the internet, I realized that when my "pointer thingy" went from arrow to finger, I could click there, and magical things awaited me.

This problem can be easily fixed. But let's be honest, would a top ENTER sign solve all of the negative feedback?

Plus, wouldn't another ENTER link be more flashy? :haha:

No.. it's a matter of preference... some people are annoyed by the flashy junk that is just in the way of getting to what is interesting --- others care little for content and only want flashy stuff. It is just that it is usually more mature (yeah older :ne_nau: ) people that want more ... more content... more of what matters and less noise and flash.

Sort of like a man and a woman :feelgood: --- an older, mature man usually enjoys learning about a woman :ahh: and gets into her mind and .... (I am getting excited here :mrgreen: ) well you older men know what I am talking about. Where a younger guy :afro: just wants photos or video of the woman naked. :lol8:

The younger people will never agree with the older ones... with few exceptions. Of course there are young mature people and older immature ones, but most of us run the natural course and mature as we get older.

Sombeech · Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 12128 Location: The Rubbish Bin

tanya wrote: Where a younger guy :afro: just wants photos or video of the woman naked. :lol8:

I think we're reaching an agreement. More naked women in the slideshow.

Alex · Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 2511 Location: SLC, UT

Sombeech wrote:

I think we're reaching an agreement. More naked women in the slideshow.

Spoken like a true young buck :roflol:

tanya · Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Posts: 5812 Location: St. George, Utah

:roll:

Alex · Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 2511 Location: SLC, UT

Hey dude, have you guys thought about using a Gallery software and embedding it into the site. This would work like a slideshow idea and give everyone access to bigger pictures.

http://gallery.menalto.com/gallery

Alex · Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 2511 Location: SLC, UT

tanya wrote: :roll:

:naughty: He is young, strong and handsome, tanya!!!! :twisted: :cool2: :naughty:

tanya · Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Posts: 5812 Location: St. George, Utah

Alex wrote: tanya wrote: :roll:

:naughty: He is young, strong and handsome, tanya!!!! :twisted: :cool2: :naughty:

~yawn~

Sombeech · Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 12128 Location: The Rubbish Bin

tanya wrote: Alex wrote: tanya wrote: :roll:

:naughty: He is young, strong and handsome, tanya!!!! :twisted: :cool2: :naughty:

~yawn~

ouch! Where's Fro Bro?

tanya · Joined: 18 Oct 2005 Posts: 5812 Location: St. George, Utah

Sombeech wrote: tanya wrote: Alex wrote: tanya wrote: :roll:

:naughty: He is young, strong and handsome, tanya!!!! :twisted: :cool2: :naughty:

~yawn~

ouch! Where's Fro Bro?

Without the "mind thing" ..... "young, strong and handsome are okay for a quickie, I guess.... and they are nice to look at. :cool2:

And although 'Beech is nice to look at this was not meant for him (because I would of course have no clue what his love/sex life is like), but for men in general that do not do the "mind thing." :nod:

Sombeech · Joined: 09 Dec 2004 Posts: 12128 Location: The Rubbish Bin

tanya wrote:
And although 'Beech is nice to look at this was not meant for him (because I would of course have no clue what his love/sex life is like)

Didn't that DVD show up yet?