Bogley  Forum Index Bogley
Outdoor Community
 


Canyon Ratings & Spry Canyon 7-8-08
Click here to go to the original topic
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
        Bogley Forum Index -> Canyoneering
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
canyonguru



Joined: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:56 am    Post subject: Canyon Ratings & Spry Canyon 7-8-08  

My budy and i tackled Spry canyon yesterday for the first time for both of us. I would have to say that i think spry is a little bit harder than a class 3 canyon and since that Spry flashed on sunday everything was chuck full of water and there was a little bit of quick sand in some places. We got trashed pretty good and it took us about 7.5 hours to complete. most of the anchors are hard to find and there are two raps that are multy raps. If you haven't done this canyon before make sure that you check the next rap to see if you have to do them together. Almost all the pulls are sketchy, just about every rap had really bad rope burns in the rock. All in all i am not sure if i would do Spry agian unless someone wanted me to take them down it. for two people we carried a 200ft rope and a 135ft rope and it worked out pretty well. so if you want to do spry this summer and not get fried by the sun do it soon before all the water is got. but i would have to say that the multiple raps twards the end of the canyon was for sure the high light of the trip you drop so much altitude at the end of Spry. so good luck if any of you head that way. :Ahnuld:
Back to top  
trackrunner



Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1011

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:03 pm    Post subject: Re: spry canyon 7-8-08  

canyonguru wrote: I would have to say that i think spry is a little bit harder than a class 3 canyon

Explain :ne_nau:

Class 3 does not have to equal easy.

Rating from ACA site http://www.canyoneering.net/content/index.php?categoryid=23

3 Intermediate Canyoneering
Exposed technical climbing. Down-climbing could be difficult and dangerous; most people will rappel instead. Rope required for belays and single-pitch rappels. Obvious natural or fixed anchors. Retreat up canyon will require ascending fixed ropes. Basic pothole escape techniques (i.e. partner assist, counter-weights) may also be required. See route description for more information.

4 Advanced Canyoneering
Route may involve any combination of the following: 1) difficult and exposed free climbing and/or down-climbing, 2) climbing using direct aid, 3) multi-pitch rappels, 4) complex rope work (i.e. guided rappels, deviations, rebelays), 5) obscure or indistinct natural anchors, 6) advanced problem-solving and anchor-building skills. See route description for more information.
Back to top  
Jaxx



Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1850

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:04 pm    Post subject:  

Spry was one of my favorites so far. What did you find difficult in the canyon to make it a 4?
Back to top  
canyonguru



Joined: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:25 pm    Post subject:  

well i wouldn't say it is a 4 and i know the rating system very well. comparable to other class 3 canyons i would say it is high on the list. the canyon had considerable debri in it from the flash on sunday and i believe we were the first group down. in one of the RD that i read it said that there was a log anchor above your head for one of the raps which i never saw. i am asuming if that RD was correct then that anchor is gone now.

This is a cut out of chris brennens write up

Just a few yards downstream the watercourse turns sharp right and you rappel down a narrow slot using a webbing anchor around an overhead chockstone. It is a 70ft drop into a small pothole/ledge, the exit from which is a 45ft rappel using a log across the narrow slot exit as the anchor.
That anchor is gone now. the pothole was complely full of water and it is a short swim for anyone under 6 foot(not me) over to the pothole ledge where we used our 200ft rope off of the first rap to finish the las 45ft.
Back to top  
oldno7



Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 711

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:26 pm    Post subject:  

I'm guessing you rapped into the pool(pothole) and pulled your rope?
really don't see a 4 rating anywhere.
Back to top  
Sombeech



Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 12657
Location: The Rubbish Bin

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:26 pm    Post subject:  

Welcome to the site by the way. :lol8:
Back to top  
trackrunner



Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 1011

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:30 pm    Post subject:  

oops should have posted this. It is the new/proposed ACA rating system also
http://www.canyoneering.net/content/index.php?categoryid=136



canyonguru got pictures?
Back to top  
canyonguru



Joined: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:41 pm    Post subject:  

no we didn't pull the ropes to soon and no its not a 4 canyon. just saying that its harder than any other 3 canyons i have done before. a good example of the new rating system. sorry no pics forgot the digi at home. i was a little worried about the water to bring a camera.
Back to top  
tanya



Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 5829
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:15 pm    Post subject:  

Spry has some tight sqeezes and some tougher rope work. How did you do rappel into the water?

Here is a link to my last trip through Spry. We went with a biology group of kids that were cute and fun.

http://www.bogley.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12001&start=0

This is the rappel I am talking about? I assume you just went straight down though...

http://www.bogley.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12001&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15


Welcome to the group!

Yeah... There are class 3's and there are class 3's!!!!!! ;) -- and it can change with the weather, time of year, PMS, and other factors.


In Zion here is a quick glance at how Bo and Rank the canyons. They are listed from what we think of as easiest to hardest taking into consideration, rope work, how hard it is for me to keep up with Bo, and other odd things --- the ACA ratings are on there too. I am not changing them until they are no longer proposed but the real deal.
http://www.zionnational-park.com/zion-national-park-canyoneering.htm
Back to top  
Iceaxe



Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 7806
Location: Local Bordello

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:48 pm    Post subject:  

Welcome to the forum Canyonguru. :2thumbs:

If you think Zion has some hard 3's you are going to love some of the ones in North Wash..... :five:

As for the "new ACA rating system", it's as flawed as the old one. I hope they trash can the idea as it will just make a giant mess of things if they change. While the current system is flawed at least everyone who sprays beta is using the same system.... this will not happen if they change the way they rate canyons. Having everyone using the same system is a major plus in my book, the new system would have to be MUCH better (and it's not) to make the change a positive...

:popcorn:
Back to top  
ratagonia



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 474
Location: Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:56 pm    Post subject:  

Iceaxe wrote: Welcome to the forum Canyonguru. :2thumbs:

If you think Zion has some hard 3's you are going to love some of the ones in North Wash..... :five:

As for the "new ACA rating system", it's as flawed as the old one. I hope they trash can the idea as it will just make a giant mess of things if they change. While the current system is flawed at least everyone who sprays beta is using the same system.... this will not happen if they change the way they rate canyons. Having everyone using the same system is a major plus in my book, the new system would have to be MUCH better (and it's not) to make the change a positive...

:popcorn:

I concur, Dr. Ice.

Two of the largest beta-providers (Ice and Moi) have ZERO buy-in to the revised system. (Rich moving forward with it reminds me of a quote I heard recently: "Can open, worms everywhere!").

Tom
Back to top  
ratagonia



Joined: 21 Feb 2005
Posts: 474
Location: Quiet and charming: Mount Carmel

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:07 pm    Post subject: Re: spry canyon 7-8-08  

canyonguru wrote: My buddy and I tackled Spry canyon yesterday for the first time for both of us. I would have to say that I think Spry is a little bit harder than a class 3 canyon and since that Spry flashed on sunday everything was chock full of water and there was a little bit of quicksand in some places. We got trashed pretty good and it took us about 7.5 hours to complete. most of the anchors are hard to find and there are two raps that are multi raps. If you haven't done this canyon before make sure that you check the next rap to see if you have to do them together.

Almost all the pulls are sketchy, just about every rap had really bad rope burns in the rock. All in all i am not sure if i would do Spry agian unless someone wanted me to take them down it. for two people we carried a 200ft rope and a 135ft rope and it worked out pretty well. so if you want to do spry this summer and not get fried by the sun do it soon before all the water is got. but i would have to say that the multiple raps towards the end of the canyon was for sure the highlight of the trip you drop so much altitude at the end of Spry. so good luck if any of you head that way. :Ahnuld:

Ha ha. Yes, the rating "3" covers a lot of ground.

"Multy" or "Multi" raps - the more technical term is multi-stage rappels.

The one under the block is usually done as a multi-stage - it is unfortunate that Chris found a log there on his descent and made it two raps (and mentioned this). There was recently a nice deadman built there by two people who pulled their rope too soon - after sending one person down off a meat belay, they pulled some logs and rocks up from below. Be careful where you get your information from, and please read page 6 of my Zion book. The most important line in there is: "Where reality and this book (or Chris's beta) disagree, make decisions based on reality".

The second multi-stage rap (just after) can be done as a throw-to-guided-rappel to stay dry; and the second part of it is not too hard of a downclimb.

Sounds like Spry is the first "real canyon" you have done. Yup, not everything is absolutely straightforward, even though almost every drop is bolted. Welcome to the real (canyon) world, canyon-grasshopper.

Tom
Back to top  
Iceaxe



Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 7806
Location: Local Bordello

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:14 pm    Post subject:  

ratagonia wrote: I concur, Dr. Ice.

Two of the largest beta-providers (Ice and Moi) have ZERO buy-in to the revised system. (Rich moving forward with it reminds me of a quote I heard recently: "Can open, worms everywhere!").

Worms everywhere..... :roflol: :roflol: :roflol:

FWIW: Mr. Kelsey's new tech book is coming out next month and also uses the "old" rating system.....

I do know that Tom, MK and myself have all modified the original ACA rankings slightly to take into account the difficult mae-west type stuff...

YMMV

:cool2:
Back to top  
canyonguru



Joined: 07 Jul 2008
Posts: 40
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:15 pm    Post subject:  

mystery,pine creek,keyhole,echo,subway,orderville,spry, is my list. so yes compared to you guys i am for sure a grasshopper. but i am working my way up. and yes tom it is very important where i get my info from. i have your book and have read it quite a bit. thanks for all the coments guys.
Back to top  
tanya



Joined: 18 Oct 2005
Posts: 5829
Location: Las Vegas

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:47 pm    Post subject:  

canyonguru wrote: mystery,pine creek,keyhole,echo,subway,orderville,spry, is my list. so yes compared to you guys i am for sure a grasshopper. but i am working my way up. and yes tom it is very important where i get my info from. i have your book and have read it quite a bit. thanks for all the coments guys.

Shane has a canyoneering book out too that has been out for quite some time. I like to read both men's personality when it comes to how they explain things.

http://www.cafepress.com/climbutah
Back to top  
 
        Bogley Forum Index -> Canyoneering Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2



Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB 2.0.21 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group