| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CarpeyBiggs
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1722
Location: Fairbanks, AK
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good questions. Here's my favorite response from you.
MY T PIMP wrote: Keep in mind that all aside this is wildlife management dictated by scintific experts much smarter than us. Whose greatest goal is simply to achieve balance for all wildlife. |
|
| Back to top |
|
MY T PIMP
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 417
Location: Layton, Ut
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CarpeyBiggs wrote: Good questions. Here's my favorite response from you.
MY T PIMP wrote: Keep in mind that all aside this is wildlife management dictated by scintific experts much smarter than us. Whose greatest goal is simply to achieve balance for all wildlife.
And I stand by that response. Sadly, this debate has has brought forth one of the few times fish and wildlife agencies were limited in involvement and allong with the government have failed to work together. Here is a quote from a statement from the Idaho Fish and Game concerning Idaho and Yellowstone Canadian Gray Wolf introduction.
Quote: At that time, the Idaho
Legislature strictly limited the Idaho Department of Fish and Game’s
involvement with wolves and wolf recovery.
I find it also sad wildlife management seems to have no say or a limited roll in what's to come on Santa Rosa Island. |
|
| Back to top |
|
CarpeyBiggs
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1722
Location: Fairbanks, AK
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MY T PIMP wrote: And I stand by that response. Sadly, this debate has has brought forth one of the few times fish and wildlife agencies were limited in involvement and allong with the government have failed to work together. Here is a quote from a statement from the Idaho Fish and Game concerning Idaho and Yellowstone Canadian Gray Wolf introduction.
Any links on that, curious to see the context of your quote. I have a hard time believing that no wildlife experts were consulted. Perhaps IFG wasn't consulted, but I'm sure there were many federal managers involved. The National Park Service is loaded with wildlife management people. But I wasn't referring to Yellowstone, I was referring to Santa Rosa. Were wildlife folks contacted before putting the animals on the island?
Sounds like you only have faith in the system when it plays in your particular favor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sombeech
Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 11245
Location: The Rubbish Bin
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CarpeyBiggs wrote: The National Park Service is loaded with wildlife management people.
Sounds like you only have faith in the system when it plays in your particular favor.
Then again, you didn't believe the NPS's numbers about the Bear population neither, so..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
CarpeyBiggs
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1722
Location: Fairbanks, AK
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sombeech wrote: CarpeyBiggs wrote: The National Park Service is loaded with wildlife management people.
Sounds like you only have faith in the system when it plays in your particular favor.
Then again, you didn't believe the NPS's numbers about the Bear population neither, so.....
Yes, which I was in fact correct about... Or did you forget that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Sombeech
Joined: 09 Dec 2004
Posts: 11245
Location: The Rubbish Bin
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No, I haven't forgot that you don't trust the NPS |
|
| Back to top |
|
CarpeyBiggs
Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1722
Location: Fairbanks, AK
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sombeech wrote: No, I haven't forgot that you don't trust the NPS
Ah yes, another classic thread bomb lobbed by my favorite moderator. Nice work.
Trust isn't the issue 'Beech. Reading comprehension is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
